Friday, October 26, 2007

China Grabs A Slice Of Africa

China Grabs A Slice Of Africa
Parmy Olson, 10.25.07, 12:40 PM ET

LONDON -
China's ambitions to get a foothold in resource-rich Africa took a significant step forward Thursday after the state-run Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (ICBC), announced it was buying 20% of Africa's biggest bank, Standard Bank, for $5.5 billion.

The deal with the South African lender is the biggest-ever foreign direct investment into South Africa and ICBC's biggest-ever investment outside China. The deal, which has to be approved by South Africa's regulators and ICBC shareholders, will nearly double foreign ownership of Standard Bank to some 40%. It will also see the two companies set up a $1 billion private equity fund for making joint investments in emerging markets. ICBC is China's biggest bank.

The deal will help give the Chinese government, which has influence over some of the country's biggest companies, important influence and credibility when making investments in Africa. Standard Bank is in 17 countries in Africa, and has investments in many African firms. (A common strategy for investing in Africa is to buy into South African companies with exposure to rapidly-growing economies, like Nigeria, as it is less risky than investing in firms with more local exposure.)

The investment also makes it a lot easier for ICBC's corporate clients in China (there are a whopping 2.5 million of them) to get access to banking services for their businesses in Africa, of which there are many. Walking down streets in Lagos, Nigeria for instance, it is not unusual to see numerous shops run by Chinese entrepreneurs.

"Chinese corporations are extremely interested in Africa across every sector, and clearly many of those have an interest in Africa, where Standard Bank is very strong," Chief Executive of Standard Bank International Rob Leigh told Forbes.com. "We've been talking to ICBC for some time around business cooperation. That's how this deal was born."

ICBC Chairman Jiang Jianqing said many of the bank's "large clients" sought African investments, and the demand for cross-border financial services is accelerating.

Rapidly-industrializing China has increasingly relied on Africa for commodities like copper, zinc, gold and iron, which are abundant. About 13% of Africa's exports now go to China, and trade from Africa to China is growing by 50% every year. It's partly why the state-run China Development Bank last July bought a chunk of Barclays, a British bank that, thanks to its longstanding colonial roots, has a strong foothold in African trade finance. CDB said then that the investment would help "facilitate international commerce for Chinese companies." In May China created a $5 billion investment fund for Africa. (See: "Say It With Investment")

Similarly to the Barclays investment, the Standard Bank investment will see China tap into long-established expertise. "By making the acquisition, ICBC gets to learn from one of the best banks in Africa," said Robert Levitt, chief investment officer of Levitt Capital Management, which has shares in Standard Bank. "It will learn about financing the mining industry. It will learn about African FX. It is a very good move."

"Probably the best financial systems of any emerging market are in South Africa," said Jan Randolph, head of sovereign risk at Global Insight. "Their banks are as good as ours, and their capital markets are as developed as anywhere else in the West, or Japan."

The Chinese government, with more than $1 trillion in foreign currency reserves, has managed to build an impressive sovereign wealth fund it is now using to make investments in companies like Barclays and Standard Bank, in order to fulfill China's short term and long term economic needs. Africa is a particularly attractive market and not just because it churns out 30% of the world's gold, half the world's diamonds, and half of the world's platinum, but also because its economy is growing rapidly.

Sub-Saharan African countries grew by 6% in 2006 for the third year in a row, largely due to rising commodity prices. Remove India and China, and the sub-Sahara has grown faster than most of Asia.

China also likes Africa because it's relatively uncomplicated. "They're interested in investing in other emerging markets because there are far fewer political issues," said Richard Ferguson, director of global emerging markets research at Nomura. "They don't have to deal with things like the U.S. Congress or the European Commission, and all the problems that go with that.”

With its myriad investments in other African companies, Standard Bank can also act as a source of credibility and influence for future business that China may do in Africa. "Every empire does this–make overseas investment to safeguard its own strategic interests. In terms of lending and in terms of the projects in which it can invest, it does bring influence,” said Ferguson.

The two banks have already worked out an impressive system for cooperation. For a start, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China will have the right to nominate two non-executive members of the Standard Bank Group board of directors, with one of the non-executive directors being nominated as the Vice Chairman of Standard Bank Group. There will also be an ICBC/Standard Bank Group Strategic Cooperation Committee.

Perhaps most intriguing of all is the so-called "global resource fund," which Standard Bank and ICBC are planning to set up as part of their new tie-up. Essentially it is a private equity fund, with a joint management team, into which both banks will provide seed money before inviting further investment. The banks aim to create a $1 billion fund focused on emerging markets.

"We've been talking about specific areas of cooperation with ICBC, and we believe there is a very compelling story of bringing Standard Bank's expertise and access to investment opportunities throughout emerging markets, together with ICBC's ability to bring their Chinese client base and Chinese investment interest in these opportunities," said Leigh. (See: "African Stock Safari")

In one way, ICBC could act as the vanguard for other Chinese companies and banks to move into Africa and make similar investments. “There are four big banks in China and what they do can be can be dictated by the minister of state responsible for them. These things tend to happen almost like a confluence of thinking,” said Ferguson.

For instance, someone from China could well go for MTN Group, the hugely successful African cell phone company. The state-run China Mobile is one potential suitor, and though MTN has a market cap of $30 billion, it's not exactly out of China's budget range. Cell phone use in Africa is growing faster than anywhere else in the world, according to a 2005 study by the Centre for Economic Policy Research.

In terms of locales, Nomura's Ferguson cites Chinese government sources as saying they have South Africa (which accounts for a quarter of Africa's GDP), Nigeria, Cameroon, Zambia, Congo-Brazzavill and Angola, in their sights, mostly due to their rich natural resources. MTN has a presence in five of those markets. Standard Bank can now act as a gateway to these countries, and much more.

full article

BizAnalyst Network
Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Back-office bottlenecks hinder foreign-exchange trading


    Back-office bottlenecks hinder foreign-exchange trading

    The foreign-exchange market's rapid expansion, partially fueled by hedge funds and increased interest in emerging markets, is causing issues with back-office operations. High volumes lead to problems with processing and bottlenecks, which can cost millions of dollars because of the size of the trades.

    full article

    Foreign exchange volumes create back-office bottlenecks
     
    Melanie Wold
     
    26 Oct 2007
    As the foreign exchange market fast approaches $4 trillion (€2.8 trillion) a day in turnover, the focus has shifted from front-office trading to the back office.

     Expansion has been partly fueled by greater interest in emerging markets and the involvement of hedge funds and their prime brokers. Processing problems include bottlenecks and errors which, because of the size of trades, can cost millions of dollars.

    Operators of foreign exchange trading platforms, including Reuters with its Dealing foreign exchange system, interdealer-broker Icap with the EBS foreign exchange platform, and electronic trading aggregator FXall are moving to straight-through processing to ensure customers can efficiently process volumes.

    Icap’s purchase of post-trade processing specialist Traiana takes the UK group into that sector and raises the bar for its competitors in the electronic trading of OTC instruments. But straight-through processing did not equate to post-trade services, said Gil Mandelzis, chief executive of Traiana. Icap previously concentrated on price discovery and trade execution but stopped short of post-trade services.

    It instead offered links to vendors of post-trade services, such as Traiana, whose messaging platform offers automated matching, confirmation and netting for foreign exchange.

    The combination of Traiana with EBS, the spot foreign exchange trading platform Icap bought from its founding bank consortium last year, gives Icap’s customers the opportunity to improve processing efficiencies, which should enable them to trade more volume, according to Mandelzis.

    Traiana’s network connects 10 custodian banks, 17 electronic crossing networks, 20 prime brokers, 40 executing banks and 600 funds. It has 400 bank-to-bank links and 2,500 tri-party links.

    Harmony, a matching system, and Netlink, which nets foreign exchange trades before they are settled, sit on top of the network. Mandelzis said Icap would keep the network separate from its brokerage operations to maintain confidentiality.

    Trade netting increases the percentage of trades that are settled the same day or the following one and decreases the number of trade tickets that have to be sent to CLS Bank for settlement.

    A bank can net its clients’ trades before it sends them to CLS, saving on settlement costs. CLS Bank, a consortium of 69 of the world’s largest banks, was launched in 2002 and has largely removed the risk involved with foreign exchange settlements.

    Trade netting is becoming more important because there are more tickets of smaller sizes. Sang Lee, co-founder and managing partner consultancy at Aite Group, said: “The more active trade, driven by algorithms, is producing smaller ticket sizes, which can put pressure on the back office. Netting reduces this.”

    FXall offers a netting service on its platform, as does State Street’s FXConnect multi-bank exchange trading network and its ECN Currenex.

    Reuters does not offer netting but launched a real-time notification service, Reuters Trade Notification Service, two years ago at the request of interdealer-broker clients that wanted more post-trade automation. The service alleviates the need to enter trades manually and, when the trades are fed into risk and position-keeping systems, it frees risk capital so they may make more trades.

    There have been rumblings that netting services may threaten the monopolistic hold CLS Bank has over foreign exchange settlements. If netting were to occur between CLS member banks, rather than between the banks and their customers, it could affect CLS revenues.

    Tony White, global co-head of research and development for Wall Street Systems, a treasury, trading and settlement solutions provider, said everyone was talking about services such as Traiana Netlink but was afraid to use them: “Nobody wants to rock the CLS boat.”

    Tom Price, an analyst with research firm TowerGroup, said FXMarketSpace, the joint venture between CME and Reuters, was intended to provide netting services to users but backed off under pressure from CLS members – a powerful group of banks that were potential FXMS users.

    A spokesman for FXMarketSpace said because it cleared and settled through CLS member CME, netting before sending to CLS was a breach of CLS’ rules. Price said FXMS was waiting for the right moment to try it again.

    The spokesman said: “We are speaking with CLS about alternatives to paying gross. FXMarketSpace has the capability to flick a switch and net trades if a resolution can be found.”

    CLS is aware of market criticism and of possible threats to its business. Jonathan Butterfield, vice-president of marketing and communications at CLS, said: “We are certainly not complacent and recognize the market is changing. Owned by and operating for our members, they have determined that there is no industry request for a change on netting.”

    Icap and Traiana are adamant they are not trying to compete with CLS. Mandelzis said: “We think CLS is providing an important service to the market; it has solved some significant issues and is here to stay.”

    Analysts believe the price Icap paid for Traiana was high – $238m in comparison with the $15m in revenues expected this year. But Icap said there was scope for Traiana to go beyond foreign exchange markets into derivatives, fixed income and equities. According to Mandelzis, there was a strategic rationale for buying Traiana but he also said: “We bought the business to make money.”

    full article

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Thursday, October 25, 2007

    Fed taking steps to increase transparency

    Fed taking steps to increase transparency

    Federal Reserve officials are putting the finishing touches on proposals aimed at increasing transparency, but they are unlikely to adopt Chairman Ben S. Bernanke's proposal to set an explicit inflation target. Other proposals would double the number of economic forecasts to four times a year. The reports would also include additional detail and background.

    full article

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • US concerned by increase in sovereign wealth funds

    US concerned by increase in sovereign wealth funds

    Government-controlled investment funds are putting strains on U.S. regulators and the market-based system, according to Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox. Cox said an increase in sovereign wealth funds and state-controlled publicly traded companies "challenges us to ask whether these many benefits of markets and private ownership will be threatened if government ownership in the economy ... becomes more significant -- or whether, alternatively, the world will be better off."

    full article

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Has the Mortgage Crisis Finally Peaked?

    Has the Mortgage Crisis Finally Peaked?

    Existing-home sales were down 8% in September, but the National Association of Realtors claims mortgage availability is finally improving

    full article

    In recent months, mortgage issues have been a main force hampering home sales but, according to a new report from the National Association of Realtors, mortgage availability is finally improving—even as home sales continue to slide.

    The rate of existing-home sales dropped 8% in September to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.04 million units from a downwardly revised rate of 5.48 million in August, according to the NAR study released Oct. 24. The national median price of existing-homes sold in September fell 4.2% year-over-year, to $211,700. September, 2007, marked the seventh consecutive month in which existing-home sales decreased.

    This continuous decline in home sales has been predictable, to put it lightly. After existing-home sales fell 4.3% in August, the NAR advised realtors and homeowners to expect "similar results" in September and cited "temporary mortgage problems" as the main reason for poor home sales in August.

    Jumbo Rates Down
    A significant rise in jumbo loan rates resulting in a high number of postponed or cancelled sales was a particularly strong disruption to August home sales, according to NAR senior economist Lawrence Yun. On Aug. 15 the 30-year fixed jumbo mortgage rate hit 7.43%, according to data from Bankrate.com.

    But now those "temporary" mortgage problems may have subsided. As of today, Bankrate.com reports that the jumbo mortgage rate is down to 6.59%. "Mortgage problems were peaking back in August when many September closings were being negotiated, and that slowed sales notably in higher-priced areas that rely more on jumbo loans," said Yun in a release. "The good news is that mortgage availability has markedly improved in recent weeks with interest rates on jumbo loans falling, and more people are applying for safer and conforming FHA mortgage products."

    The bad news is that home sales are still dropping sharply in the wake of July and August's credit market turmoil, as existing-home sale figures typically reflect credit conditions during the month or two before closings. The September drop in homes sales and the median home price "left a report for the month that managed to prove even weaker in all respects than the market feared," said Mike Englund, chief economist at Action Economics.

    More Resets On the Way
    And, while it's possible that mortgage availability is improving as you read this, it's also possible that the credit situation could still get worse. "Compared to August, yes, the availability of mortgages is probably a little better now," said Moody's Economy.com (MCO) housing economist Celia Chen. "But I wouldn't say that mortgage problems peaked [in August] because there are still a lot of people with subprime mortgages facing resets right now."

    But in some ways, the mortgage market's future is looking a little less grim. Some banks are even starting to help out borrowers in trouble. Major mortgage lender Countrywide Financial (CFC) said on Oct. 23 that it has come up with a new refinancing plan to help homeowners avoid foreclosure. The company has created a special finance unit of 2,700 employees that will work with borrowers who are likely to have difficulty making payments once their adjustable mortgages reset.

    When will the bleeding stop? Mortgage problems will likely weigh heavily on October home sales, but the NAR's prediction may turn out to have some truth in it after all. "Sales in October may be as ugly as September's," said Global Insight economist Patrick Newport, who expects housing activity to hit bottom in mid-2008. "Afterward, the drops will be smaller."

    full article

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • SubPrime Bailout Superfund should sell in open market

    SubPrime Bailout Superfund should sell in open market

    Warren Buffett said today that a $75 billion "superfund" created to buy the assets of troubled investment vehicles should consider selling a portion of those assets in the open market. Doing so would help determine the actual value of the underlying assets, he said. Buffett joins former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and other influential economic thinkers in raising caution about the fund, which was created by Citigroup, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase with the encouragement of the U.S. Treasury.

    full article

    Buffett cautious on $75bn superfund
    By Anna Fifield

    Published: October 25 2007 10:48 | Last updated: October 25 2007 10:48

    The US banks creating a $75bn-plus “super fund” to buy the assets of troubled investment vehicles should sell a portion of the fund into the open market to help determine the actual value of the underlying assets, Warren Buffett said on Thursday.

    The billionaire investor is the latest in a stream of influential figures – including Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve – to question the superfund being promoted by Citigroup, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase with the encouragement of the US Treasury.

    “One of the lessons that investors seem to have to learn over and over again, and will again in the future, is that not only can you not turn a toad into a prince by kissing it, but you can not turn a toad into a prince by repackaging it,” Mr Buffett said during a one-day visit to South Korea

    “But very imaginative people in the securities market try to do that. If you have bad mortgages they do not come better by repackaging them. To some extent the chickens are coming home to roost for the mortgage originators and securitisers,” he said.

    The superfund would buy assets from cash-strapped structured investment vehicles (SIVs) following the subprime mortgage crisis in the US. The three banks behind the scheme are still thrashing out key details about how the fund will purchase assets and at what price.

    Mr Buffett, one of the world’s most successful investors, said the market should set the price.

    “I think there should be a requirement that before the securities are put into the new super-SIV, 10 per cent of the holdings should be sold into the market to people who are not associated [with the subprime problem],” he said.

    “That way we can be sure that they are being put in at appropriate market prices…They should give the market the opportunity to price the super-SIV themselves so we can see what they are really worth.”

    Mr Buffett was speaking in the southern Korean city of Daegu, where he was visiting TaeguTec, an industrial tool manufacturer that is wholly owned by Iscar Metalworking Companies (IMC) of Israel. His Berkshire Hathaway holding company bought an 80 per cent stake in IMC for $4bn last year.

    Mr Buffett, who last year sharply reduced his bets on the US dollar again, said his increased exposure to other currencies meant he made $2.3bn on foreign exchange last year and more than $100m so far this year.

    “We are still negative on the dollar. We bought stocks in companies that are earning their money in other currencies,” he said, citing Berkshire Hathaway’s investment in Tesco, the British supermarket chain.

    “We are gaining through owning businesses that produce earnings in other currencies. We like the fact that Posco earns its money in won,” Mr Buffett said, referring to the South Korean steelmaker in which Berkshire Hathaway has a 4 per cent stake.

    “We have benefited to the tune of about $300m simply though the appreciation of the won, as well as through the dividends that we receive in other currencies,” he said.

    full article

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Tuesday, October 23, 2007

    Countrywide to Refi $16 Billion (before ARMs Reset)

    Countrywide to Refinance Up to $16 Billion of Loans

    CFC - today announced a comprehensive home preservation program to reach out to borrowers at-risk of default.  Countrywide will launch an outbound calling initiative to refinance or modify up to $16 billion of Countrywide loans for borrowers who are facing an adjustable-rate mortgage reset through the end of 2008.

    Oct. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Countrywide Financial Corp., the biggest U.S. mortgage lender, plans to refinance or restructure as much as $16 billion of debt for home buyers facing higher payments on adjustable-rate mortgages before the end of 2008.

    Countrywide has already refinanced $5 billion of loans and plans to contact 52,000 subprime borrowers with $10 billion of debt to offer new loans, the Calabasas, California-based company said today in a statement. It may modify terms on as much as $6.2 billion of mortgages for borrowers ineligible for refinancing.

    Countrywide's stock has fallen 63 percent this year amid the worst housing slump in 16 years, which left the mortgage lender short of cash in August. Homeowners with poor credit histories risk losing their homes as mortgage payments jump.

    ``Countrywide believes that none of our subprime borrowers that have demonstrated the ability to make payments should lose their home to foreclosure solely as a result of a rate reset,'' David Sambol, the company's president and chief operating officer, said in the statement.

    Last week, Countrywide said it will take a pretax restructuring charge of as much as $150 million to cut operations and as many as 12,000 jobs because of slower lending. About $57 million of the expense will be booked in the third quarter with the remainder in the fourth.

    Subprime mortgages are available to borrowers with bad or incomplete credit histories. They made up about 20 percent of home loans issued last year and about 11 percent in the first half of this year, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, an industry newsletter.

    Full article

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Homeowner Bankruptcies Surge (credit crunch #2)

    Bankruptcies surge among US homeowners

    Homeowners who fall behind on their mortgages are increasingly turning towards bankruptcy in order to stay in their homes; while Chapt 7 filings are still the most common, there is an increasing amount of chapt 13 filings.  "an increasing number of homeowners have filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13, which staves off foreclosure proceedings while the homeowner works out a plan to pay off mortgage debt and other obligations over time -- usually three to five years. To qualify, debtors must have a regular income and must stay current on their new bills. About four in 10 filers today are filing under Chapter 13 -- up from three in 10 two years ago. The 2005 change in bankruptcy laws was designed in part to shift more filers to Chapter 13, which forgives less debt than Chapter 7" - WSJ

    The number of Americans filing for bankruptcy soared 23 per cent last month as homeowners fought to prevent their homes from being repossessed - London Times

    Bankruptcies surge among US homeowners

    The number of those seeking protection from creditors rose over a fifth last month as more fight to keep their homes

    The number of Americans filing for bankruptcy soared 23 per cent last month as homeowners fought to prevent their homes from being repossessed.

    According to the American Bankruptcy Institute, around 69,000 people applied for two types of bankruptcy, one of which protects homeowners from being evicted from their homes if they can present a feasible plan to keep on top of their debt repayments and have a regular income.

    The Institute, a national non-profit research group whose members include bankruptcy attorneys, judges and lenders, said that more homeowners had applied for bankruptcy in states where the property slump was more severe.

    The figures reveal the impact of the housing recession in America, which marks the worst real estate slowdown for 16 years. They also raise pressure on the US Federal Reserve Bank to cut rates again when it meets next week. In September, the Fed reduced the cost of borrowing by a half percentage point to avert a deepening credit crisis in the US. It is expected that Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Fed, will cut rates again before Christmas.

    Over a nine month period, the number of personal bankruptcies rose almost 45 per cent compared with the same period last year.

    Traditionally, most borrowers who filed for bankruptcy, did so under under Chapter 7 of the federal Bankruptcy Code. Under that provision, debtors have to give up certain assets, often a chunk of equity in their homes. Those assets are sold to pay off borrowings. Typically, while the measure stops the foreclosure process, it just buys a borrower time, and most lose their home.

    However, according to The Institute, an increasing number of Americans are opting for bankruptcy under Chapter 13, where a homeowner is often given three to five years to stick to an agreed repayment plan and keep their homes.

    Court papers in Washington show that the number of personal bankruptcies under Chapter 13 doubled in California during the second quarter of the year, rose by 40 per cent in Ilinois and 70 per cent in Massachusetts.

    There are rising concerns that the blight affecting American property prices will travel across the Atlantic to Britain. Only last week, the International Monetary Fund warned that Britain was vulnerable to an American-style property slowdown, as it argued that homes in the UK were overpriced by 40 per cent.

    full article

     

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Peak Oil Causes Economic Problems

    Peak Oil Causes Economic Problems

    World oil production has already peaked and will fall from the current 81M bbls/day to 39M bbs/day by 2030, according to an Energy Watch Group report which is due to be released today. The group says that global oil production has peaked in 2006, much earlier than most experts had expected and predicts that production will now fall by 7% a year. EWG’s founder says the “world soon will not be able to produce all the oil it needs as demand is rising while supply is falling. This is a huge problem for the world economy.” The group also predicts significant falls in gas, coal and uranium production as those energy sources are used up.

    Related articles

     

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • ICE & NYBOT shut down trading floor

    ICE & NYBOT shut down trading floor

    The New York Board of Trade is planning to officially shut down its futures pits in the next six months as electronic commodities trading takes over, according to sources familiar with the matter.  The move could leave as many as 1K people out of work.

     NYBOT plans to shut down futures pits

    NEW YORK, Oct 22 (Reuters) - The New York Board of Trade (NYBOT), which has been renamed ICE Futures US, is planning to officially shut down its futures pits in the next six months as electronic commodities trading takes over, the New York Post reported on Monday, citing unnamed sources.

    IntercontinentalExchange (ICE.N: Quote, Profile, Research) (ICE) spokeswoman Kelly Loeffler told Reuters that any such move would require a vote by the board, adding that has not taken place.

    Under terms of the Nov. 17, 2006, merger agreement between ICE and NYBOT, the floor can only be closed if "the average daily volume of open-outcry trading in any core product or all core products in the aggregate falls below 50 percent of the corresponding 2005 levels."

    "Those conditions have been met, but there hasn't been a proposal or a vote," Loeffler said.

    Shutting most of the trading floor could leave nearly 1,000 people out of work, the Post reported. The exchange may also abandon its headquarters at the World Financial Center in New York, which is owned by the neighboring New York Mercantile Exchange Inc (NMX.N: Quote, Profile, Research) the paper said.

    Atlanta-based ICE, an electronic exchange, acquired NYBOT in January for $1.8 billion, and the following month introduced electronic trading to the traditional open-outcry platform for agricultural commodities.

    Electronic volume quickly exceeded expectations, with the bulk of trades for most of the soft commodities currently being done on the screen.

    Floor volume currently accounts for no more than 15 percent of total NYBOT trading volume.

    ICE shares fell nearly 2 percent to $160.70 in mid-day trading on the the New York Stock Exchange.

    Full Article

     

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • CFDs Go Electronic (Australia goes first)

    CFDs Go Electronic (contract for Difference - Equity Derivatives)

    Australian Securities Exchange will next month become the world’s first exchange to offer trading in “contracts for difference”, derivatives that have typically been used by investors such as hedge funds to gain exposure to shares without directly owning them. The move is part of the ASX’s effort to capture business from over-the-counter investors who trade CFDs, as well as creating a mechanism that will appeal to retail investors.

    Australia first with CFD platform

    Perth-based niche financial services player Marketech Pty Ltd has launched a zero brokerage online trading platform for the Contracts for Difference Market, which is due to be launched next month by the Australian Securities Exchange.

    Competition is set to intensify in Australia's rapidly growing retail investment market for Contracts for Difference (CFDs) with the launch today of a zero brokerage online CFD trading platform by Perth-based Marketech Pty Ltd.

    "The time, the technology, and the sophistication of investors is now right to offer zero brokerage to the estimated 50,000 people who currently use or trade CFDs in Australia," Marketech Chief Executive Officer, Mr James Martin, said today.

    "With trader numbers set to explode, offering zero brokerage on the Top 500 stocks, with Direct Market Access CFDs on every ASX listed company also, is an important evolution in Australia's equities marketplace," Mr Martin said.

    "I believe this will help investors take advantage of the various hedging and investment strategies offered by CFDs," he said.

    CFDs are a type of derivative that trade in a similar fashion to shares. They provide leverage for an investor to take an investment position depending on their view of the likelihood of a short or medium term rise or fall in an underlying stock.

    Australia's CFD trading volumes are currently estimated to be growing at around 100 % per annum.

    The ASX is due to next month to become the first Exchange in the world to offer CFD trading although on an extremely limited scale of shares, currencies, indices and commodities.

    Marketech formally launched its CFD product today, culminating two years of software development and market research.

    "The Marketech trading platform has been designed to the highest levels of speed and stability possible, using the latest technology housed in a state-of-the-art data warehouse facility for maximum security and availability," Mr Martin said.

    "CFDs investors will recognise the added value of Direct Market Access CFDs as Marketech will assign every order placed, directly into the underlying market.

    "This, coupled with free live streaming data and Marketech's free proprietary trading platform, provides a compelling competitive edge against the sector's more entrenched CFD providers."

    Mr Martin said there was a time when investors were required to trade with two platforms - one to trade CFDs on the top 'blue chip' stocks and the second for trading shares outside of this group.

    "Marketech offers CFDs across every ASX-listed company within one trading platform," he said.

    "We provide zero brokerage on the Top 500 stocks and competitive brokerage rates for all remaining listed companies, therefore providing an industry leading solution for novice and professional investors alike."

    Full details of margin, interest rate, brokerage, levies and relevant Product Disclosure Statements are available from the Marketech website www.marketech.com.au

     

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Low cost health benefits with IAB
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Thursday, October 18, 2007

    Jobs: Equity Derivatives & Technology / Project Manager (NYC)

    My name is Francis and I'm an IT recruiter at Algomod Technologies Corporation. Are you are an experienced IT professional with experience in derivatives? This experience is relevant to one of my current openings.

    It is located in Park Avenue, NY.

    Main Job Function:
    This key hire will lead Equity Derivatives Technology in the Americas. This person will be responsible for the management and direction of the regional department as well as managing the key client relationships for the area.

    Main Duties and Responsibilities:
    Contribution to the strategic direction for the Equity Derivatives technology group. Ensuring US requirements are captured and delivered by global technology strategy. Ensuring delivery of projects to meet business objectives.

    Qualifications/Education Required:
    Degree educated – 2.1 GPA or better  (MS,MBA preferred)

    Qualifications/Education Preferred:


    Experience Required:
    6-10 years directly related industry experience

    Experience Preferred:


    Skills / Aptitude Required:

    • Clear and demonstrable leadership experience in a demanding and expanding Front Office environment
    • Excellent understanding of relevant and up-to-date technical knowledge, applications and techniques
    • Demonstrates experience of significantly strengthening business performance
    • Continually delivering process improvement
    • Understanding of cost drivers and proven ability to successfully manage budgets 

    You may send me an e-mail. If you do respond via e-mail please include a daytime phone number so I can reach you.  In considering candidates, time is of the essence, so please respond ASAP.  Thank you.

          Sincerely yours,
          Francis Guzman  
          Algomod Technologies Corp.

    Contact: Francis.Guzman@algomod.com

     

     

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Get $50 with your IAB membership
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • The best in business metrics (Business Analysts, Project Managers)

    Work Centered Analysis Framework

    The WCA framework summarizes the elements any business professional should look at when analyzing an existing or potential system in an organization. The framework says that the system is much more than just technology. Instead, the system is actually a work system consisting of a business process performed by human participants using information and technology. Unless the purpose of the analysis is to improve the way the system operates internally without changing anything about what it produces or why it exists, the analysis of the system needs to include the product it produces and the customers it serves. Learn more.

    The Metrics of IT: Management by Measurement

    TechRepublic: The authors of this downloadable paper say that CIOs should focus on measuring and managing only things that help the company differentiate itself from competitors. They suggest evaluating the size and scope of any problems, developing action plans to solve them, and evaluating the effectiveness of the solution. It should be possible to apply measurement data directly to those steps. They suggest ISO certification or other total quality management systems can help. Rather than using relatively meaningless — and scary — metrics such as percentage of revenue calculations, they advise expressing the budget in terms of need and impact on the business, breaking down spending in each product area and by each project. Beware of trying to sort through too much data or using measurements that are too dependent on complex chains of data, they say, and automate any data that will be routinely measured. They discuss the Balanced Scorecard and how it can work in tandem with service level agreements, and offer "10 truths" about SLAs. Learn more.

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Get $50 with your IAB membership
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.



  • State Street gets sued over retirement-plan losses

    State Street Is Sued Over Fund Losses

    By JENNIFER LEVITZ
    October 18, 2007; Page C9

    A New York publishing company filed a purported class-action lawsuit against State Street Corp. late yesterday over losses in fixed-income funds held in workplace retirement plans.

    Unisystems Inc., which filed the suit, alleges that the Boston-based financial-services concern represented its lineup of actively managed bond funds as conservative options but instead invested the funds in "high risk" instruments and mortgage-backed securities.

    State Street spokeswoman Hannah Grove said: "We deny any allegation that we didn't correctly communicate the investment objective of the fund."

    State Street's investment arm, State Street Global Advisors, manages $2 trillion in assets, mostly for institutional investors. The company says $36 billion of that is in actively managed fixed-income funds.

    In the lawsuit, filed in federal court in New York, Unisystems alleges that 25 of its employees had $1.4 million in State Street's Intermediate Bond Fund, an unregistered institutional fund.

    The lawsuit alleges that between July 1 and Sept. 1, the fund declined by 25% in value while the index it "purported to track actually increased."

    State Street's own documents provided to institutional investors say the objective of the Intermediate Bond Fund is to "match or exceed the return" of the index of U.S. government and corporate bonds.

    State Street told institutional investors in a recent report that as of July 31, the Intermediate Bond Fund was leveraged more than 4-to-1 -- meaning the fund borrowed to increase its portfolio to about four times the amount of money clients invested. The footnote says the investments included Treasury futures, options on futures, interest-rate swaps and a complex investment vehicle known as interest-rate "swaptions."

    "My client doesn't understand why they would do this when the reason people were in the fund was to have a conservative, predictable investment," said Gerald Silk, a lawyer with Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann LLP, which is representing the purported class-action.

    Earlier this month, a unit of Prudential Financial Inc. sued State Street over $80 million in losses that 165 retirement plans it manages suffered in State Street fixed-income funds -- one of them the same fund Unisystems is suing over. Prudential says State Street didn't disclose that the money was in "highly leveraged" investments. Attorneys general in Alaska and Idaho are also looking into possible legal action against the company over losses in state retirement funds.

    In recent years, State Street changed strategies in some funds in its fixed-income division to find more attractive yields, according to a letter sent to institutional investors in August. And in its most recent annual report, the company explained that its average portfolio included fewer plain vanilla government bonds, and more "collateralized mortgage-backed securities" and asset-backed securities than a year earlier. The Intermediate Bond Fund had 25% of its portfolio in asset-backed securities, according to the report to clients.

    full article

     

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Get $50 with your IAB membership
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Wednesday, October 17, 2007

    Where's Basel II? Cracks in the armour...

    Where's Basel II? Cracks in the armour...

    The Basel Accords I and II were put in place to set standards on global banks recognition of capital. Yet the Credit Crunch of Aug 2007 seems to have put these guidelines at risk.  Is Basel II effective in todays global capital and banking environment. What's going wrong?

    A recent article from Financial Times highlights the issue.

    Banks & Balance sheets - FT article (quoting a Merrill report) says US commercial banks have seen $280B of new debt come back onto their balance sheets during the summer credit crisis.  As banks have had to accommodate this influx of assets, they have less room to lend out into the economy.  According to data from the Federal Reserve, large bank capital represented by net assets had declined by $40bn since the beginning of August.  According to Merrill - "This has never happened before over such a short timeframe and this is rather serious because such a steep and sudden compression in large-bank capital has the potential to create a negative lending environment,".  Recall this is one of the major risks to the outlook cited by D. Malpass - the strained balance sheets of many banks will hurt lending, which will in turn translate into weaker eco growth going forward.  On Citi's call Monday, one of the disappointments was the fact its capital ratios had become so stretched as to limit balance sheet growth and stock buybacks.

    Related article #1 | Related article #2


    Basel regulators believe crisis far from over-source

    The global credit crisis is far from over and may come in waves, a source close to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision said on Friday.

    Regulators from around the world will meet next week to discuss what the source described as the "hard-core liquidity crisis" which has forced central banks to inject billions of dollars in emergency liquidity into the banking system.

    But the source, who declined to be named, said the Basel Committee was unlikely even to discuss suggestions that central banks should become market makers of last resort when liquidity dries up, saying such an idea is out of the question.

    Stock markets have hit record highs in recent days due to optimism that the worst of the credit crisis may be over, while primary U.S. bond markets and some loan markets have revived following the Federal Reserve's interest rate cut on Sept. 18.

    But regulators on the Basel Committee are less optimistic as they gather in the Swiss city. "In banking and in supervisory circles, this crisis is far from over," said the source. "This crisis may unfold itself in waves."

    The Committee will put the liquidity crisis, in which banks have been largely unwilling to lend to each another, at the top of its agenda, the source said.

    "Liquidity hasn't played a big role so far but now we can see that we have a hard-core liquidity crisis," said the source. "This is something that has very rarely happened before ... where banks don't trust each other."

    Liquidity -- or lack of it -- is one of the top risks for banking institutions, but rulebooks such as the international Basel II accord which the Committee drew up have focused instead on capital requirements.


    STRESS TEST

    Committee deliberations are unlikely to result in proposals for a new liquidity risk charge -- which would force banks to set aside more emergency cash -- but rather in guidelines or "soft regulations" on how to cope with crises, the source said.

    "The core of the issue is stress testing and contingency plans," the source said.

    The source said Committee members were unlikely even to debate suggestions by some private-sector bankers that central banks become market makers of last resort for illiquid assets to keep the wheels of international finance turning.

    "This is out of the question. This is something the market wants but at the current time there is no debate on this," the source said.

    "If any central bank opened this possibility, they would be flooded, literally flooded, with hundreds of billions in asset backed commercial paper," the source said. "This would be a classical case of bailing out the speculators."

    The global credit crisis that developed in August was triggered by defaults on U.S. mortgage debt that had been extensively repackaged and sold as asset backed securities to institutions, including hedge funds, around the world.

    Regulators have been torn between ensuring that markets keep working by providing emergency liquidity, and the risk that this will simply inflate another market bubble following the equities boom of the late 1990s and the property boom of this decade.

    They are also anxious to avoid "moral hazard" in which investors, shielded from risk by official bailouts, are encouraged to behave increasingly recklessly.

     

    Basel watchdog eyes tighter rules after crisis

    The world's top banking regulators are mulling new safety rules in the wake of financial turmoil that has triggered a "crisis of confidence" among banks and major disruption in the global financial system.

    Regulators and central bankers concluded a two-day Basel Committee meeting in Basel on Tuesday by urging tighter supervision and better risk management and calling on banks to shed light on complex and hard-to-sell investments.

    A source close to the committee, speaking under condition of anonymity, said the situation was "fragile" but not "precarious" and said the group was on alert for further jolts that could send shock waves through the financial system.

    "Because the markets are still at a delicate stage, the impact could be a little larger than in normal market conditions -- that's why it's important for supervisors and central banks to continue to be vigilant and to closely monitor the situation," the source said.

    "There is a crisis of confidence," the source said.

    The Basel Committee includes the world's top banking supervisors and sets the global standards banks employ to shield themselves from bad loans or surprise shocks that could throw the international financial system into disarray.

    Central banks and regulators have launched forensic efforts to understand why the credit crisis, first triggered by the default of U.S. sub-prime mortgage investments, had such violent knock-on effects for the global economy.

    The committee is still reviewing lessons learned from the crisis -- which saw big, global banks cease to lend to one another overnight, putting a huge strain on the international financial system -- and may modify how banks make emergency preparations for stressed market conditions.

    But it was still too early to draw conclusions that could lead to rules changes -- partly because the crisis has not played itself out fully, the source said.

    "We're keeping the door open," he said.


    SPOTLIGHT

    The committee's conclusions are likely to get considerable attention ahead of the G7 meeting of finance ministers in Washington later this month where the crisis, and ways to mitigate it, will loom large.

    Lessons are still piling up, such as from the run on British mortgage lender Northern Rock (NRK.L: Quote, Profile, Research) last month where the bank's lending business remained sound but its market access to funding dried up.

    The ministers are expected to analyse the crisis and possibly review oversight procedures for non-bank financial heavyweights which can wreak havoc in the financial sector, as the U.S. sub-prime mortgage crisis has illustrated.

    Those include hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds or non-bank actors such as U.S. mortgage companies which have largely escaped the level of regulatory scrutiny applied to internationally active, systemically critical banks.

    A separate group of international enforcers, the Financial Stability Forum, is expected to provide an analysis to finance ministers over what went wrong.

    At the close of the two-day meeting, the committee threw its support behind the latest rewrite of global banking rules, known as Basel II, which has taken fire from politicians and central bankers in recent weeks.

    Basel II, which was published in 2004, represents the biggest change in risk management in a generation and is due to go live in Europe in 2008 and in the United States one year later.

    The committee said the new accord would create more incentives for improved risk management, especially in the types of asset-backed investments that triggered liquidity problems among banks in the current crisis.

    The committee said it would soon propose new charges for risks posed by complex and illiquid investments when those investments are held on banks' own accounts -- a phenomenon known as trading book risk.

    Related article #1 | Related article #2

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Get $50 with your IAB membership
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • ABX to restructure indices in light of credit crunch

    ABX plans to restructure indices in light of credit crunch

    Several credit-derivative indices tied to bonds backed by subprime mortgages will be restructured. The move comes with the anticipated drop-off in the issuance of the bonds in light of the current credit-market crisis. The four ABX derivative indices may change their criteria because securitizations have fallen so low.

    full article

    Sub-prime bond drought to force index change
     
    Lianna Brinded
     
    17 Oct 2007
    A series of credit derivative indices tied to bonds backed by sub-prime mortgages will have to be restructured because issuance of the bonds is expected to fall sharply as a result of the credit crisis.

    The four ABX derivative indices, which track the cost or spread of credit derivatives on 20 bonds secured by sub-prime mortgages and home-equity loans, are struggling to replace maturing bonds with newly qualified issues because supply has been severely hit by the sub-prime mortgage crisis in the US.

    New versions of the indices are created every six months as some of the securities mature and fall out of the index, leaving room for newly issued asset-backed securities to qualify. However, the dearth of new supply in the past three months and poor outlook to the end of the year may lead the indexes being changed.

    Ben Logan, managing director for product development at New York-based Markit Group, an independent source for credit derivative pricing, said: “The ABX indexes may need to change their criteria because securitizations have fallen so low, so there may not be enough bonds to fill the series."

    ABX credit derivative contracts, or credit default swaps, are commonly used by bond investors to speculate on or hedge against the risk of the underlying security it references not being repaid as expected. The indexes were created last year to reference asset-backed bonds, the lowest quality of which are narrowly rated as investment grade, at BBB-.

    The cost of buying protection on a BBB- rated bonds through the index has plunged about 73% to 26.81 cents in the dollar since it started trading in January this year because of a unexpected sharp rise in US sub-prime mortgage loan delinquencies, which in turn provoked the wider credit turmoil that ensued.

    Home loans to borrowers with patchy credit histories have fallen sharply since the crisis first emerged earlier this year as lenders have begun to tighten standards, leading to steep decline in the volume of the loans being securitized by banks and sold on to the capital markets as bonds.

    full article

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Get $50 with your IAB membership
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.

  • Subprime-mortgage meltdown: A series of bad bets

    Subprime-mortgage meltdown caused by series of bad bets

    The meltdown in the subprime-mortgage market was caused by lending decisions that were based on assumptions that left little room for error. The mortgage crisis is "a case study on the way that greed convinced everyone there wasn't risk," said Ivy Zelman, CEO of Zelman & Associates. Problems are spreading in dominolike fashion and could continue for some time.

    Full article  |  Follow the Sub Prime Loan

    • Behind Subprime Woes, A Cascade of Bad Bets
    • One Loan's Journey Shows Culture of Risk
    • The Fall of a Fund Whiz

    By CARRICK MOLLENKAMP and IAN MCDONALD
    October 17, 2007; Page A1

    Three years ago, Colorado truck driver Roger Rodriguez was in the market for a new mortgage loan. With radio and Internet ads trumpeting easy approvals, he picked up the phone.

    That call set into motion Mr. Rodriguez's descent into the subprime mortgage mess. Over the next several months, his adjustable-rate loan passed through many hands. These included a local Denver broker, Livingston, N.J., finance company CIT Group Inc. and a Greenwich, Conn., unit of Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC. Eventually, a piece of Mr. Rodriguez's loan landed in mutual funds run by a Tennessee investor named James C. Kelsoe Jr.

    Little good has come to any party that touched the loan. Mr. Rodriguez, now 61 years old, has lost both his job and his home. All the middlemen, from the broker to CIT to RBS, have either shuttered their mortgage businesses or are struggling. Mr. Kelsoe, once a star mutual-fund manager, has hit a career low as defaults on subprime mortgages decreased the value of his investments.

    The paper trail from Mr. Rodriguez to Mr. Kelsoe illustrates how the mortgage market meltdown scalded millions of homeowners and investors. It also foreshadows how the domino effect stands to continue.

    Much of the mortgage lending of the past several years, as well as investments in mortgage-backed securities, was based on assumptions that left little room for error. As a result, even slight deviations from a perfect world -- in which people act prudently, unemployment stays low, lenders keep lending and house prices rise -- pose risks in the form of more defaults, foreclosures and other investment losses.

    Behind the market turmoil of recent months: Lending standards were more lax than most people imagined, a fact that surfaced when house prices stalled.

    The mortgage crisis is "a case study on the way that greed convinced everyone there wasn't risk," says Ivy Zelman, CEO of Zelman & Associates, an independent real-estate research firm.

    Should house prices fall by 10% over the next two years -- an outcome analysts see as entirely possible -- losses stand to be staggering. Thomas Zimmerman, head of mortgage credit research at UBS in New York, estimates that in such a scenario losses due to defaults could wipe out as much as 16% of the nearly $600 billion in subprime-backed securities issued in 2006. In August, such losses were equivalent to less than 1% of the total.

    The jobs market also plays a key role. If the unemployment rate ticks upward by a percentage point or more, Mr. Zimmerman believes losses due to defaults could easily exceed 20% -- enough to hit even some of the most highly rated securities.

    Back in 2004, Mr. Rodriguez didn't realize he was meandering into trouble. Two decades earlier, he had moved from Powell, Wyo., to start a new life in Colorado after struggling as a sugar-beet farmer. He, his wife, Irene, and two grandchildren, now 4 and 12, took up residence in a modest development called Prospector's Point in the town of Westminster, where their home boasted unobstructed Rocky Mountain views. Mr. Rodriguez held a steady job driving a recycling truck for Waste Management Inc.

    Sometime in the fall of 2004, Mr. Rodriguez decided he could use some money for debt consolidation. He turned to a company called EquityRelief.com, which promoted itself on the radio and the Internet with slogans such as "Debt relief is stress relief at EquityRelief.com."

    The Denver company already had handled his $70,000 mortgage two years earlier, he says. Still suffering from marginal credit, he enlisted the mortgage broker once again.

    Within a matter of weeks, Mr. Rodriguez had secured a new mortgage, for $88,000, from finance company CIT Group. That was enough to settle his outstanding home loan, as well as cover auto debts and a few home repairs. His income -- about $4,000 a month before taxes -- enabled him to pay the $544.70 initial monthly note, plus living expenses and installments on his credit-card debts. But with hardly any savings, he had little wiggle room in case something went wrong. Beyond that, the monthly payment was scheduled to reset after two years, most likely to a higher level -- a common feature of so-called adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMS.

    Mr. Rodriguez's low credit score meant it would have been difficult for him to obtain a prime loan. He says he chose an ARM, with an introductory rate of 6.3%, because that's what the broker offered. "I just went along with it," he says. "They made it so easy." At the time, a prime, 30-year fixed-rate mortgage had an interest rate of 5.87%. But the introductory rate on Mr. Rodriguez's ARM would apply for just two years before resetting -- up to a maximum of 12.3%.

    Bryon Veal, who ran the brokerage, says he typically warned customers to use adjustable-rate products only if they planned to be in a property for a short period of time. Mr. Veal also says his firm advised borrowers that rates would increase.

    Around this time, hundreds of thousands of borrowers, and the lenders who served them, were beginning to make even more optimistic assumptions about their ability to handle subprime debt. Lenders frequently approved borrowers for loans based only on their credit score and often without verifying income and they effectively ignored the fact that monthly notes would later reset. The universal, hopeful assumption: With house prices rising, borrowers would be able to refinance before the rate increases hit.

    Back in 2004, lenders in the subprime sphere had little reason to worry whether borrowers were getting in over their heads. That's because they often quickly resold some of the loans at a profit. Wall Street banks snapped them up, packaged them into securities and sold them on to investors. CIT was no exception. In 2004, the company, which offers loans for everything from heavy equipment to college tuition, was building its business of originating and selling home mortgages.

    Within five months, CIT had sold Mr. Rodriguez's loan along with others to RBS Greenwich Capital, a unit of the Royal Bank of Scotland located in the tony financial hub of Greenwich. To obtain such loans, RBS had to outbid other investment banks active in the mortgage market, such as Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank AG and Bear Stearns Cos.

    RBS was making an aggressive bet on the mortgage business, sharply boosting its capacity to buy and package loans. By 2005, it had risen to third place among investment banks by volume of U.S. residential mortgage-backed securitizations, according to Thomson Financial. That was up from sixth place in 2000.

    RBS and CIT declined to say how much they profited at various points in the mortgage-securitization process. Generally speaking, as the loans progress through the chain, buyers and sellers skim a bit from each sale. Profits from the securities are usually determined by a complex set of factors, including cash flow -- which is affected by timely payments from borrowers like Mr. Rodriguez.

    In February 2005, RBS packaged Mr. Rodriguez's loan -- along with 4,853 others -- into a trust called Soundview 2005-1. The trust slices the cash flows from the loans into notes with different levels of risk and return. Within five days, RBS's sales team had sold $778 million in Soundview 2005-1 notes to investors around the world.

    One buyer was Mr. Kelsoe, a senior portfolio manager at the asset-management unit of Morgan Keegan & Co., a Memphis, Tenn., investment firm and unit of Regions Financial Corp. At the time, Mr. Kelsoe was riding the housing boom by investing heavily in mortgage-backed securities. At the end of 2005, his RMK Select High Income Fund showed a five-year average annual gain of nearly 14%, according to Morningstar Inc. That performance beat all U.S. high-yield funds as well as the Dow Jones Industrial Average. His success brought him a bit of celebrity. He appeared on CNBC, was quoted in The Wall Street Journal and gave investing lectures at universities.

    "He talked about the importance of identifying and assessing risk," says Wilburn Lane, head of the business school at Lambuth University in Jackson, Tenn. Mr. Kelsoe spoke there in October 2006 to some 300 local businesspeople over a chicken-and-vegetables lunch. Mr. Lane, who says he was impressed with the 44-year-old's track record, later invested in one of the seven funds managed by Mr. Kelsoe.

    Mr. Kelsoe's big returns, though, depended heavily on the good fortune of borrowers such as Mr. Rodriguez.

    Through various of his funds, Mr. Kelsoe invested nearly $8 million in one of the Soundview 2005-1 trust's riskiest pieces. The B-3 tranche, as it was called, offered a return of at least 3.25 percentage points above the London interbank offered rate -- a key short-term rate at which banks lend to each other. But if borrowers like Mr. Rodriguez began to default on their loans, any losses exceeding 1.25% of the entire loan pool could eat into the value of the B-3 tranche.

    In February 2006, at least one borrower in the Soundview 2005-1 trust had a big piece of bad luck. After pulling into a Waste Management repair facility in the Denver suburb of Commerce City, Mr. Rodriguez detached the trailer from his 18-wheel rig but forgot to set the brake on the tractor. The tractor rolled across a street and hit a parked pickup truck, causing about $2,000 in damage. Soon afterward, says Mr. Rodriguez, Waste Management fired him. "They considered that a critical rollaway," he said. Waste Management confirmed that Mr. Rodriguez no longer works for the company, but declined to provide details.

    "Ten seconds can change your whole life around," Mr. Rodriguez says a friend remarked to him recently.

    Mr. Rodriguez took on odd jobs, working on a paving crew and in a bakery. But his income fell to about $1,800 a month in 2006. To make matters worse, the monthly note on his mortgage reset to more than $700 in November. He fell behind on the higher payments.

    On Feb. 15, 2007, a Denver law firm, acting on behalf of the Soundview trust, began foreclosure proceedings against Mr. Rodriguez and his wife. The firm cited "failure to pay monthly payments of principal and interest" on an outstanding balance of $85,976.48, Colorado real-estate documents show. Mr. Rodriguez filed for bankruptcy protection on July 23, a move that extended the time he could remain in his home by several months.

    Other borrowers in the Soundview trust also began to default on their loans. By June 2007, defaults had afflicted 3.44% of the loan pool, more than triple the level of a year earlier, according to people familiar with the trust's finances. About four in 10 loans were at least 30 days in arrears -- all in a period during which the U.S. economy was growing at a healthy pace and unemployment was low.

    Because Mr. Kelsoe's investment in the B-3 tranche was so sensitive to losses, its market price plunged. In fact, as trading in subprime-backed securities dried up amid a broader panic, Mr. Kelsoe, like other investors with subprime holdings, had difficulty figuring out what the investments were worth.

    At the end of June, the latest information available, Mr. Kelsoe's funds reported an estimated market value of the Soundview investment that was 35% below what they had paid.

    A Morgan Keegan spokeswoman said Mr. Kelsoe wasn't available to comment because he was focused on managing his funds.

    At the end of August, Mr. Kelsoe's Select High Income Fund posted a loss of nearly 28% for the month -- dead last among its peers for the year and for five years as well, according to Morningstar. The fund also postponed filing an annual report until earlier this month. When the fund filed the report with regulators on Oct. 4, Mr. Kelsoe said in a note to shareholders that the bond markets' "ocean of liquidity has quickly become a desert."

    In a letter to a Memphis newspaper, Charles Reaves, an attorney who had invested in one of Mr. Kelsoe's funds, wrote that Mr. Kelsoe was "hiding under his desk" and "should have the fortitude to face the public and explain...what he intends to do."

    Things haven't gone much better for the mortgage units at CIT and RBS -- though they did profit handsomely during the good times. CIT, citing a "problematic outlook" for the business, in July announced plans to shut down its mortgage business and lay off about 550 employees. A CIT spokeswoman says its mortgage portfolio performed better than peers.

    Morale at RBS Greenwich had suffered in recent weeks as employees braced for layoffs. RBS Greenwich recently eliminated 44 of its 1,760 jobs.

    In the first half of the year, total income for the company's U.S. asset-backed securities business, which includes mortgage-backed securities, fell 23% to $614 million. An RBS spokeswoman said, "In common with all players, our operations have been scaled back to reflect the lower volumes of business across the industry."

    Late this summer, Mr. Rodriguez sat on a courthouse bench after his bankruptcy hearing. "I'm under a lot of depression to tell you the truth," he said a day earlier, tears brimming in his eyes. A worried Mrs. Rodriguez said she feared her husband was suicidal.

    Soon afterwards, the couple had vacated their home of 22 years and moved into a low-income apartment in northwest Denver.

    Full article  |  Follow the Sub Prime Loan

    BizAnalyst Network
    Award winning services for graduate students and business professionals.


    Member Rewards

  • Get $50 with your IAB membership
  • Fill up with FREE Gas from Discover Card
  • The $30,000 Millionaire. GET THIS BOOK!

    Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%. Earn Great Returns. $25 Sign-Up Bonus. Borrow up to $25K. Rates as low as 7.00%.