Friday, February 29, 2008

Credit Derivatives - Is Your Mutual Fund At Risk?


Is Your Fund At Risk?

Complex financial instruments called credit default swaps have roiled the financial markets for months. They're at the heart of the bond insurers' woes and were a reason why insurance giant AIG (AIG) just added billions to a planned writedown. But if you think exposure to these derivative securities is limited only to insurers and investment banks, take a good look at your seemingly bland, conservative bond fund.

Start with the world's largest, Bill Gross's $120 billion Pimco Total Return fund. Gross railed against credit default swaps (CDS) in his January investor newsletter, calling them securitized weapons of mass destruction. But the latest holdings for his bond fund, as of Sept. 30, show more than 300 CDS positions, some as large as $200 million.

Gross is hardly alone in dabbling in the swaps, which allow managers to get a bump up in yield as well as hedge their bond positions. Of the 30 largest bond funds, 12 have exposure to credit default swaps, including Oppenheimer Strategic Income, T. Rowe Price New Income, Western Asset Core Plus Bond, Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade, and four Pimco funds. Unlike some of the troubled CDS of late, the swaps in these mutual funds aren't necessarily related to subprime mortgages.

[full article]

BizAnalyst Network

The business and career development network for financial services professionals

Get Advice Get Funding Join Our Network





Credit Derivatives Market Innovation


Credit Derivatives Market Innovation - Reframing the issue

Whether the market can rethink its approach to the complexity of credit derivatives is discussed by Brad Bailey, director in business development at Knight Capital Group

Since the sub-prime summer of 2007, the credit market has posed a number of challenges. The impact has been powerful and the ramifications are very much being felt. The street is littered with the heads of the fallen, from junior analysts to bulge-bracket ceos.

It is often said that, while success has many parents, failure is an orphan - which is not the case when it comes to dissecting the causes of the credit crisis. There are myriad explanations: all the readers of SCI will have their own theories.

The pain has been real for investors. But, from the pain, can some good come of it?

Despite the valiant efforts of many market participants, despite regulatory pressure in the past to clean up operational challenges in various OTC markets, there still has not been enough action to change certain practices in the industry. An entire industry has been born on top of products that have grown beyond their ability to function with the level of demands on them.

As creative as they are, many solutions offered to the OTC derivative world are solving just part of the problem. Perhaps the fundamental issue has to be restated.

The success, on-going growth and adoption of credit derivatives result from the fact that they solve a very big problem. Just as their predecessors offered a means of mitigating such risks as interest rate or exchange rate risk, they have offered an effective means of mitigating credit risk.

They have grown bigger and faster than most could imagine. It makes perfect sense, as mitigating credit risk is hugely important.

It is, hence, logical that the credit derivative is considered to be one of the most important financial innovations of recent times. But what if the solution becomes the problem?

The credit derivative market has evolved in a piecemeal fashion. Challenges arise and solutions are offered reactively, reflecting the best possibility for a given time. Dedicated professionals have come together time and again, despite high levels of competition with one another, to solve each new problem: definitions, events, settlements, lock-ins and so on.

After 15 years of this iterative process, we have wonderful parts but a whole that does not add up. An optimist thinks we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist knows it. The credit derivative as a tool for mitigation of risk and for creating innovative products has been a huge success; the credit derivative as a product gets a less than glowing review.

In other words, perhaps we have not been framing the problem correctly to date. We need what a credit derivative can do, but the vessel to affect that is so imperfect that it has created numerous problems.

Ultimately, the mid-to-long term impact of the credit market dislocation is not clear. What is clear, however, is that the ability to offer credit risk mitigation is a huge benefit to many.
There is nothing like a market meltdown to help people rethink their approach to the complexity of this market. From a transparency, valuation, accounting, trading, settlement and operational perspective, there is a lot of work to be done.

[full article]

BizAnalyst Network

The business and career development network for financial services professionals

Get Advice Get Funding Join Our Network





What doesMoody's 'AAA' rated credit really mean?


Moody's, S&P Say MBIA Is AAA; Debt Market Not So Sure

Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's say MBIA Inc. has enough capital to withstand losses and justify its AAA rating. MBIA's debt investors aren't so convinced.

Credit-default swaps indicating the risk that Armonk, New York-based MBIA's bond insurance unit won't be able to meet its obligations are trading at similar levels to companies such as homebuilder Pulte Homes Inc., which is rated 10 steps lower.

The discrepancy illustrates the skepticism debt investors have about the safety of MBIA's rating after the company posted $3.4 billion of losses on subprime mortgages last quarter. Moody's and S&P both said that while at least $4 billion of writedowns lie ahead, MBIA's management has made enough changes to warrant the top rating.

``Pardon me if I find this a little hard to believe,'' said Richard Larkin, director of research at municipal-bond brokerage Herbert J. Sims & Co. in Iselin, New Jersey. ``This is basically the same management that put MBIA into this hole in the first place.''

Moody's yesterday ended a five-week review of MBIA, the world's largest bond insurer, removing the threat of an imminent downgrade. S&P did the same a day earlier and also affirmed the top rating of New York-based Ambac Financial Group Inc., the second-biggest. Ambac is still under review from both S&P and Moody's.

Credit-Default Swaps
Credit-default swaps tied to MBIA's insurance unit rose 3 basis points today to 363 basis points, according to London-based CMA Datavision. The contracts, which rise as investors see increased risk and fall when confidence improves, have dropped 24 basis points the past three days. That's still up from less than 100 as recently as October. The contracts rose above 720 last month as banks, securities firms and investors used them to hedge against the risk that the firm wouldn't be able to make good on its insurance obligations.

Contracts on Bloomfield Hills, Michigan-based Pulte are trading at about 370 basis points, CMA price show. The BB+ rated homebuilder has reported five straight quarterly losses. The company is considered junk, or below investment grade.

Credit-default swaps are financial instruments based on bonds and loans that are used to speculate on a company's ability to repay debt. They pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent should a borrower fail to adhere to its debt agreements.

A basis point on a credit-default swap contract protecting $10 million of debt from default for five years is equivalent to $1,000 a year.

`So Much Uncertainty'
The decisions by Moody's and S&P to retain the ratings protected as much as $637 billion of debt from downgrade, avoided fire sales of municipal bonds and helped save banks from as much as $70 billion of losses, based on Oppenheimer & Co. estimates.

MBIA Chief Executive Officer Jay Brown, who returned to the post last week after the ouster of Gary Dunton, said the ratings decisions were unrelated to concerns a downgrade would roil credit markets. ``I think that's dead wrong,'' Brown told CNBC Television.

Moody's and S&P came under scrutiny from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Congress last year for giving excessively high rankings to securities backed by mortgages to people with poor credit and helping to inflate a bubble that burst last year and sent investors fleeing credit markets.

The ratings firms ``certainly have less credibility than they had before,'' said Dan Castro, chief credit officer of the structured finance business at GSC Group in New York. ``On the other hand, the affirmation gives investors a sigh of relief.''

MBIA shares, down 77 percent the past year, fell 22 cents, or 1.4 percent, to $15.06 as of 9:50 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Ambac, down 86 percent the past year, fell 2 cents to $12.17.

CDO Expansion
MBIA and the rest of the bond insurers were criticized by ratings companies, lawmakers and regulators over their decision to expand into collateralized debt obligations that caused losses of more than $7 billion. The company previously recorded at least 15 years of consecutive profits insuring bonds sold by schools, hospitals and municipalities. CDOs are packages of debt sliced into pieces with varying ratings.

Moody's chose to retain the ratings even though it said MBIA likely faces $4 billion in losses. In a worst-case scenario, the company, which has claims-paying resources of $16.1 billion, could lose as much as $13.7 billion, Moody's said.

A credit rating cut would have stymied MBIA's ability to guarantee debt. Even now, sellers of municipal debt have avoided having their bonds guaranteed by MBIA. MBIA didn't sell any guarantees on municipal bonds issued during the first two weeks of February, according to data compiled by Thomson Financial and cited by Merrill Lynch & Co. last week.
Faces Losses

``MBIA still faces longer term issues about whether its franchise value has been permanently impaired by its credit derivatives exposure'' to subprime bonds and CDOs, Kathleen Shanley, an analyst at Gimme Credit LLC in Chicago, wrote in a report yesterday. ``The problems can't be neatly resolved overnight.''

Moody's said the decision to affirm the rating was in part because of MBIA's $2.6 billion in capital raising as well as this week's announcement that the company will stop guaranteeing structured finance securities for six months. That and a tightening in underwriting standards means risk is reduced, the ratings firm said.

[full article]


BizAnalyst Network

The business and career development network for financial services professionals

Get Advice Get Funding Join Our Network





"Credit Default Swaps" Next Domino of The Global Credit Crunch?


"Credit Default Swaps" Next Domino of The Global Credit Crunch?

The increasingly large dark cloud looming on the financial markets horizon is the threat of Credit Default Swaps (CDS) derivatives risk, which is likely to dwarf the sub-prime crisis when in full play. The global market for CDSs has rocketed over the past four years as they have been widely utilised by the thinly capitalised off-balance sheet vehicles created and/or utilised by large financial institutions -- banks, insurance and reinsurance groups, hedge and investment funds. The total amount of outstanding CDS derivatives' trades worldwide is notionally USD 46 trillion. This CDS market dwarfs the markets in US stocks (USD 22 trillion), mortgage securities (USD 7 trillion) and US treasuries (4.5 trillion).

Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) are instruments used for loans and bonds, and effectively act as an insurance policy on corporate debt. The trades also allow speculation on a company's ability to repay the debt. Credit default swaps is an area where both counterparty risk is opaque and the insurance in some cases has become increasingly impaired. CDSs have been widely used by the thinly capitalised off-balance sheet vehicles created and/or utilised by financial institutions over the past few years, and so these could struggle to find the money required if the derivative contracts are triggered, creating so-called counterparty risk for those expecting to be paid.

Large financial institutions releasing results are now provisioning for credit default swaps exposure, often linked to troubled bond insurers, alongside sub-prime mortgage debt instruments. Financial institutions have become major players in the credit default swap market over the last few years and problematic exposure is beginning to unravel step-by-step with acceleration.

Bond insurers that started insuring more complex products like credit default swaps and collateralised debt obligations have been hard hit by the falling value of those products. Often a financial institution's deal involves buying a credit default swap (CDS) and then selling it on to another for a small fee. The trade can come undone due to the downgrading of the bond insurer, which is the counterparty risk. Once the counterparty gets into difficulty, the financial institution faces a credit-risk event because it must now insure a big group of companies' bond issues. Typically, it would only lose money if around 20% of those companies fail to pay interest on the bond. Investment banks are now carefully scrutinising their own and other banks' exposure to CDSs as they are relatively untested instruments through a protracted downturn, which is anticipated.

In a complete reversal of historic norms, European financial institutions' -- primarily banks' -- credit default swaps, a good indicator of funding costs, are now trading in aggregate at higher spreads than the Continent's blue-chip corporate borrowers. Many banks are now unable to obtain funding at rates that would allow them to profitably lend to their higher-quality clients. And while the European Central Bank's (ECB) willingness to provide banks short-term funding against loans they are stuck with has helped to avoid an out-and-out disaster, it too leaves "deposit-taking loan-extending" traditional banks with an unworkable business model as they become increasingly unwilling to extend new credits or take on extra risk.

So far, few CDS contracts have been triggered because corporate defaults have been rare. But debt agencies expect the worldwide default rate for junk-rated firms to jump this year from 0.9% to just under 5% -- the historical average -- as the economy weakens. The overall corporate-insolvency rate (encompassing investment-grade and junk debt) is set to return to a historically typical 1.25%. That would trigger around USD 500 billion in default insurance, however, whether the payments will be made is a matter of solvency.

For example, the risk of Asia Pacific corporates and governments defaulting on their debt has risen recently on concern that a proposal to split US bond insurers may spark further credit losses, credit-default swaps show. Over the past couple of days, the Markit iTraxx Asia Index of 20 high-risk, high-yield borrowers increased by 19 basis points to 580 basis points. There are worries about the credit contagion from the US sub-prime and monoline insurance groups spreading to CDSs and beyond.

Since the credit-default swap indices are benchmarks for protecting debt against default, traders have been increasingly utilising them to speculate on shifts in credit quality. A basis point, or 0.01%, is typically equivalent to USD 1,000 on a credit default swap that protects USD 10 million of debt from default, a leveraged protection of 10,000 times. The contracts were originally developed to protect bondholders by paying the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities should the borrower default but were not envisaged to become massive engines of speculation themselves. This massive speculative element with CDS derivatives also creates a "Weapon of Mass Destruction" WMD effect in the financial world with unintended and unenvisaged consequences.

Rising turmoil in the Credit Default Swap market could result in a much greater financial crisis in 2008/2009 than that caused by the sub-prime crisis in late 2007. The victims may not just be banks and hedge funds but also insurance and reinsurance companies and the financial arms of many industrials and manufacturers heavily involved in CDS speculation and trades.

[full article]

BizAnalyst Network

The business and career development network for financial services professionals

Get Advice Get Funding Join Our Network





Credit Crisis - Fed Will Act in a `Timely Manner'


Bernanke Pledges Fed Will Act in a `Timely Manner'

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke signaled the U.S. central bank is prepared to lower interest rates again even amid signs of accelerating inflation.

The Fed ``will be carefully evaluating incoming information bearing on the economic outlook and will act in a timely manner as needed to support growth and to provide adequate insurance against downside risks,'' Bernanke said in testimony to the House Financial Services Committee in Washington.

Bernanke's remarks may reinforce investors' expectations that policy makers will lower rates further to shore up the faltering economy. While officials have expressed concern that inflation is accelerating, Bernanke indicated he shares Vice Chairman Donald Kohn's view that financial-market turmoil and slowing growth pose the ``greater threat.''

Bernanke's testimony came as government reports today showed the U.S. expansion, now in its seventh year, is in peril. Durable-goods orders fell 5.3 percent, more than forecast, in January as companies cut spending. New-home sales fell last month to the lowest level since February 1995 and house prices slid by a record 15 percent from a year ago.

``The Fed is in full risk-management mode, which means it has to prioritize financial market stability and growth over inflation in the near term,'' said Diane Swonk, chief economist of Mesirow Financial Inc. in Chicago. ``The discussion of inflation and inflation expectations, however, effectively sets the stage for a fairly quick normalization of rates once growth stabilizes.''

`Mistakes Were Made'
Congress has accused the central bank of failing to adequately supervise mortgage lending and protect consumers. Committee Chairman Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat, said ``excessive deregulation'' was the ``single-biggest cause'' of the downturn. Later in the hearing, Bernanke said: ``I think there were mistakes in terms of regulation and oversight.''

Bernanke referred to ``downside'' risks for the economy four times in his testimony, and noted that data since the last Fed meeting in January pointed to ``sluggish'' growth. Policy choices have also become more complicated as energy and commodity prices rose in recent weeks, he indicated.
Stocks advanced after Bernanke's remarks, with the Standard & Poor's 500 index gaining 0.3 percent to 1,385.84.

Inflation is picking up and the public's expectations for prices may also be rising, Bernanke said. He reiterated remarks made to a Senate hearing on Feb. 14 indicating the Fed will increasingly take account of the inflation outlook later in the year as the economy stabilizes.

``Further increases in the prices of energy and other commodities in recent weeks, together with the latest data on consumer prices, suggest slightly greater upside risks to the projections of both overall and core inflation than we saw last month,'' Bernanke said.

Prices Climb
Consumer prices last year surged 4.1 percent, the most in 17 years, spurred by higher fuel and food costs. A government report yesterday showed the 12-month increase in wholesale costs accelerated to 7.4 percent in January, the biggest jump since 1981.

Risks to the outlook include ``the possibilities that the housing market or the labor market may deteriorate more than is currently anticipated and that credit conditions may tighten substantially further,'' the Fed chairman said.

Fed's Effectiveness
Bernanke said pressures in credit markets have offset some of the Fed's interest-rate cuts.
``Even as the Fed has lowered interest rates and as the general pattern of interest rates has declined, the pressures in the credit markets has caused greater and greater spreads, particularly for risky borrowers,'' Bernanke said in response to a question from Representative Luis Gutierrez, an Illinois Democrat.

Traders anticipate the central bank will lower the benchmark rate by at least half a point by the end of the next meeting, on March 18, futures prices show. Officials have lowered the rate by 2.25 percentage points since September, to 3 percent.

A half-point reduction to 2.5 percent would bring the rate adjusted for inflation, less food and energy, to almost zero.

Bernanke, 54, is in the seventh month of a credit crisis that began with rising delinquencies on subprime mortgages, while also grappling with the economic impact of the worst housing recession in a quarter century. Banks are making it tougher to get loans after financial companies posted $162 billion in asset writedowns and credit losses since the beginning of 2007.

Inflation Expectations
In its separate monetary-policy report released with the testimony, the Fed said near-term inflation expectations, measured by surveys, ``rose somewhat in 2007 and early 2008, presumably because of the increase in headline inflation.'' Longer-term expectations ``changed only slightly.''

``A critical task for the Federal Reserve over the course of this year will be to assess whether the stance of monetary policy is properly calibrated to foster our mandated objectives of maximum employment and price stability,'' the Fed chairman said.

Economic reports since the Fed last met on Jan. 29-30 showed the first decline in U.S. payrolls in more than four years in January and a slide this month in consumer confidence to the lowest level since 2003.

``The economic situation has become distinctly less favorable since the time of our July report,'' Bernanke said. Still, the $168 billion stimulus package enacted by Congress and signed by President George W. Bush this month and continued gains in exports should help growth, he said.

`Little Momentum'
In the semiannual report, the Fed said that the U.S. economy ``seems to have entered 2008 with little momentum.'' Labor demand ``has slowed further of late,'' it said.
Bernanke focused the final pages of his testimony on the Fed's efforts to strengthen consumer protections and prevent foreclosures. He said in answering questions that the final rules will be released before July.

[full article]

BizAnalyst Network

The business and career development network for financial services professionals

Get Advice Get Funding Join Our Network





Fannie, Freddie get mortgage relief


Fannie, Freddie get mortgage relief

Government lifts cap on the amount of mortgages the lenders can hold, overshadowing news of Fannie's heavy losses.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares soared as much as 16 percent Wednesday after the government-sponsored lenders' regulator removed limits on the growth of the companies' mortgage portfolios.

The news, which could free the companies to become more active in buying mortgages amid a sharp decline in the housing market and a slowdown in the secondary markets for mortgage-related securities, overshadowed the bigger-than-expected fourth-quarter loss that Fannie Mae (FNM) reported earlier in the day. Fannie shares fell as much as 8 percent in early trading Wednesday before rallying on the regulatory move.

James Lockhart, head of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, said he would lift the firms' mortgage caps Saturday. He cited the progress both Fannie and Freddie (FRE, Fortune 500) have made in putting years of accounting problems behind them.

"Fannie Mae published its timely, audited financial statement for 2007 today and Freddie Mac anticipates publishing its statement tomorrow," Lockhart said in a midmorning statement. "These steps constitute an important milestone in remediation of their respective operational and control weaknesses that led to multi-year periods when neither company released timely, audited financial statements."

Lockhart also said OFHEO will discuss reducing capital requirements at the companies. Since both Fannie and Freddie were found earlier this decade to have been manipulating their accounting to smooth earnings growth and boost management bonuses, OFHEO has been requiring that they hold 30 percent more capital in a bid to cushion against future losses.

But with house prices falling and private investors having fled the market for mortgage securities, many legislators have been advocating an expanded role for Fannie and Freddie in buying mortgages. They argue that freeing the companies to do so will help to stabilize the housing market and reduce the possibility of a shock to the economy.

The companies' portfolios were capped two years ago at $727 billion for Fannie and $713 billion for Freddie. In September, OFHEO loosened the limits slightly, to $735 billion for each company. Now there is no cap.

Investors cheered the prospect of renewed portfolio growth at the companies -despite the stark commentary on the housing market in Fannie Mae's annual results.

Fannie lost $3.56 billion, or $3.80 a share, for the quarter ended Dec. 31, reversing the year-ago profit of $604 million, or 49 cents a share. The latest-quarter loss reflected a $3.2 billion writedown of the value of Fannie's credit derivatives portfolio, which the firm uses to hedge against interest rate risk on its mortgage holdings, and a $2.8 billion provision for credit losses, which are rising as house prices fall and the economy slows.

Analysts had been anticipating a poor quarter, with Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch downgrading the stock to sell from neutral in recent days. But the size of Fannie's fourth-quarter loss exceeded even skeptics' estimates. Goldman, for instance, had been forecasting a fourth-quarter loss of $1.75 a share at Fannie.

Unlike most public companies, which publish their quarterly financial results on their Web sites and issue press releases through wire services, Fannie made its quarterly numbers available at the end of a 98-page appendix to its 162-page annual report, which was filed Wednesday morning with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The filing indicates that Fannie expects to endure more losses in the coming year.

"We are experiencing high serious delinquency rates and credit losses across our conventional single-family mortgage credit book of business, especially for loans to borrowers with low credit scores and loans with high loan-to-value ('LTV') ratios," Fannie writes on page 24 of its 10-K filing. "We expect these trends to continue and that we will experience increased delinquencies and credit losses in 2008 as compared with 2007." Fannie says 2008 losses could worse if the economy heads into recession.

Fannie's poor numbers suggest Freddie's fourth-quarter report Thursday morning will be ugly as well. Analysts on average expect Freddie to announce losses of $2.34 a share, although Goldman expects an even steeper loss of $3.70 a share.

For now, with the government stepping in to ease the housing market's pain, investors might not care.



BizAnalyst Network

The business and career development network for financial services professionals

Get Advice Get Funding Join Our Network





Unauthorized Trading Follies


Unauthorized Trading Follies

Has Risk Managment and Trading Credit Risk lost their bite? Remember Joe Jett and Kidder Peabody? Out of business.

In one month, two global investment banks have reported steep losses due to unauthorized trading by their proprietary traders. Who was watching the store?

As these articles show, next day Risk Management equals no managment in our world of electronic trading and volatile markets. Real-time trading & credit risk management systems may now get their chance to shine.

BizAnalyst Network

The business and career development network for financial services professionals

Get Advice Get Funding Join Our Network





India's Budget Offering Forgiveness On Farm Debt


India's Budget Offering Forgiveness On Farm Debt

With an eye on upcoming elections, India's Finance Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram waived farm debts and cut personal taxes, in an attempt to boost consumption amid slowing economic growth.

In his fifth annual budget presentation, the minister increased exemption limits for personal taxes to 150,000 rupees ($3,755.16), from 110,000 ($2,753.79) rupees, in a nation where only a third of the population pays taxes. He left corporate tax rates and surcharges unchanged.

He also cut excise duties on pharmaceutical goods--exempting AIDS drugs entirely--and small and hybrid cars and abolished duties on wireless data cards. Jewelry exports, which suffered last year as the rupee appreciated against the dollar, also got duty relief on select gems.

Indian automakers were expecting some budget relief after their sales suffered last year because of tightening interest rates. Loans finance a preponderance of the passenger vehicles purchased in India.

"The budget was about populist measures, but the finance minister has shown some commitment to financial reforms," said D. K. Joshi, chief economist at Crisil, the Indian arm of ratings agency Standard and Poor's.. "He's given a fillip to growth by reducing excise duties on key sectors like autos, and has put more money to spend into the hands of consumers."

Chidambaram forecast that the fiscal deficit will be 2.5% of GDP for the fiscal year 2009, down from an estimated 3.3% this year. Economic growth for the quarter ended Dec. 31 stood at 8.4%, compared to 8.9% in the previous quarter, the government said Friday. Last fiscal year, GDP growth was 9.6%.

Agriculture has "struck a disappointing note," Chidambaram said in Parliament. Growth rates in the primary sector are expected to be about 2.8% for the year ending March 31. Agriculture accounts for the livelihoods of about two-thirds of India's population, and consequentially has a powerful voting base.

Farmers don't pay taxes in India. And on Friday, Chidambaram attempted to ensure that those in need also don't have to repay loans. He announced a debt relief package that is expected to cost the exchequer 600 billion rupees ($15 billion), putting additional pressure on government finances.
Last year, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh estimated the government's food, fertilizer and oil subsidies were likely to exceed $25 billion. But, as the ruling coalition faces elections in five states this year and general elections that must be held before May 2009, it wants to ensure the voters are happy.

The markets, however, were none too happy with the budget, after Chidambaram hiked taxes on short-term capital gains, to 15%, from 10%. The benchmark Sensex on the Bombay Stock Exchange was down 2.7%, at 17,364.51. The National Stock Exchange's Nifty fell 2.7%, to 5,143.25.
"The measures are likely to have a short-term impact on the markets, but there's no immediate cause for concern," said Samiran Chakraborty, chief economist at ICICI Bank. "Though the government is indicating there could be further measures to tackle capital flows if they don't moderate on their own.." Last year, a surge of capital inflows increased inflationary pressures, prompting the central bank to tighten interest rates. Inflation for the week ended Feb. 16 stood at a high of 4.89%, an eight-month high.


BizAnalyst Network

The business and career development network for financial services professionals

Get Advice Get Funding Join Our Network